¶1Appellant was charged by complaint and information with *416the offense of possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area.
¶2A jury being waived, trial was had before the court on a plea of not guilty, resulting in a judgment of conviction with punishment at a fine of $150.00, and one day in jail.
¶3T. R. Gholson, an employee of the Texas Liquor Control Board, in possession of search warrant, entered the premises of appellant situated in a dry area. According to the statement of facts, following the overruling of an objection to the testimony regarding such search, “Mr. Gholson was then permitted to testify that he found several bottles of intoxicating liquor on the premises and that the amount of intoxicating liquor found there was in excess of one quart.”
¶4We find no proof in the record that the intoxicating liquor found on the premises of appellant was whiskey.
¶5Such being the allegation of the state, in the absence of proof that appellant possessed whiskey for the purpose of sale, the conviction cannot stand.
¶6The affidavit for search warrant includes the positive averment that the premises occupied by appellant was a place where alcoholic beverages were unlawfully possessed, sold, manufactured, kept and stored in violation of the provisions of the Texas Liquor Control Act, 666-1 et. seq. The objection to the introduction of testimony as to the search made thereunder, and the result thereof, was therefore not error. See Harris v. State, 112 Tex. Cr. R. 219, 15 S.W. 2d 1048.
¶7The evidence being insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
¶8Opinion approved by the court.