Warren v. Keep’s Empirical Analysis
155 U.S. 265 · 1894
Citation profile
65 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1950 · most notably Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Company v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Company (1912), Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. (1908)
65 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tilghman v. Proctor · Littlefield v. Perry · Mowry v. Whitney · Crawford v. Neal · Furrer v. Ferris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Where the iiatented invention is for a new article of manufacture, which is sold separately, the patentee is entitled to damages arising from the manufacture and sale of the entire article.” Manufacturing Co. v. Cowing, 105 U. S, 253 , 26 L. Ed. 987 ; Hurtbut v. Schillinger, 130 U. S. 456 , 9 Sup. Ct. 584 , 32 L. Ed. 1011 ; Crosby Valve Co. v. Safety Yalve Co., 141 U. S. 441 , 12 Sup. Ct. 49 , 35 L. Ed. 809 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.