Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Wis. 2d 202 - State v. Lemay

155 Wis. 2d 202 - State v. Lemay’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
4
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Pharm v. Hatcher (1993), 201 Wis. 2d 121 - State v. Mueller (1996)

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

1401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · United States v. MacDonald · Dickey v. Florida · United States v. MacDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “held that the Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment does not apply to the period before a defendant is indicted, arrested or otherwise officially accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in some way formally becomes the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right... in prosecutions by indictment, or information, to a speedy public trial....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.