Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Wis. 2d 53 - State v. Seifert

155 Wis. 2d 53 - State v. Seifert’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2017

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

100199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Powell · 97 Wis. 2d 72 - Steele v. State · Allison v. State · 80 Wis. 2d 122 - State v. Mendoza · State v. Esser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that unnecessary or unreasonable acts in the context of imperfect self-defense manslaughter refer to acts resulting from an error in judgment or perception in contrast to the acts of a person of ordinary intelligence and prudence, not to acts resulting from a complete absence of reason and rational thought.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(b) Unnecessary defensive force. Death was caused because the actor believed he or she or another was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that the force used was necessary to defend the endangered person, if either belief was unreasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “never intended to cover situations ... where it is entirely the defendant's mental disease or defect, not an error in judgment or perception or a negligently-formed perspective of the situation, that motivates the defendant's actions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.