Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Wis. 2d 796 - State v. Behnke

155 Wis. 2d 796 - State v. Behnke’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Penson v. Ohio · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · United States v. Cronic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he right to poll the jury at the return of the verdict is a corollary to the defendant's right to a unanimous verdict. Polling is a means by which the uncoerced unanimity of the verdict can be tested. Each juror must take individual responsibility and state publicly that he or she agrees with the announced verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The right to poll the jury at the return of the verdict is a corollary to the defendant's right to a unanimous verdict.... The right to poll the jury is intertwined with the defendant's constitutional right to counsel at the return of the jury verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was so serious as to deprive [the defendant] of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.