Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 W. Va. 431 - Baldwin v. Butcher

155 W. Va. 431 - Baldwin v. Butcher’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
12
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty. (1985), Amadio v. Levin (1985)

64 state decisions — followed in 12 states

22019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woods v. Lancet · Smith v. Brennan · Verkennes v. Corniea · Dietrich v. Inhabitants of Northampton · 91 Ga. App. 712 - Porter v. Lassiter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever the death of a person shall be caused by wrongful act, neglect, or default, and the act, neglect or default is such as would (if death had not ensued) have entitled the party injured to maintain an action to recover damages in respect thereof, then, and in every such case, the person who, or the corporation which, would have been liable if death had not ensued, shall be liable to an action for damages, notwithstanding the death of the person injured, and although the death shall have been caused under such circumstances as amount in law to murder in the first or second degree, or manslaughter.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Under the provisions of Sections 5 and 6, Article 7, Chapter 55, Code, 1931, as amended, the wrongful death statute of this State, an action may be maintained by the personal representative of a viable unborn child for the wrongful death of such child caused by injuries sustained by it while in the womb of its mother resulting from the negligence of the defendant and, upon sufficient proof, such damages as may be recoverable under the statute may be awarded in such action.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “As no right of action for death by a wrongful act existed at common law, the right or cause of action for wrongful death, if maintainable, exists under and by virtue of the provisions of the wrongful death statute of this State, Sections 5 and 6, Article 7, Chapter 55, Code, 1931, as amended[.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.