Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 W. Va. 516 - In Re Hendricks

155 W. Va. 516 - In Re Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2014

3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

13019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS OF W. VA. BAR v. Pietranton · Committee On Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. Pietranton · 131 W. Va. 66 - In Re: Damron · State v. Shumate · 135 W. Va. 126 - In Re Marcum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * Upon final submission of the case, the court shall consider the same and shall, by order entered of record, dismiss the complaint, administer a public reprimand to the attorney, suspend the attorney's license to practice law in this State for such period of time and upon such terms and conditions as may be adjudged by the court, annul the attorney's license to practice law in this State, or take such other action as the court in its judgment may consider proper, which order may include such provisions for reimbursement of the actual and necessary expenses incurred by the committee in connection with said case as the court shall deem just.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In a court proceeding prosecuted by the Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar, for the purpose of having annulled the license of an attorney to practice law, the burden is on the committee to prove, by full, preponderating and clear evidence, the charge contained in the complaint filed on behalf of the committee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.