¶1Interlocutory judgment reversed and the verdict of the *925j ury set aside and a new trial granted, upon questions of law and fact, with costs to appellants to abide event. Held, that the verdict of the jury and the finding of the trial court, that the deed was procured to be executed and delivered by means of fraud and undue influence practiced upon the grantor, are contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concurred; McLennan, P. J., not sitting.
156 A.D. 924
Erwin v. Lutman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1913-04-15
Decided 1913-04-15