Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 ALA 103 - Pumphrey v. State

Pumphrey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 501 So. 2d 520 - McCord v. State (1986), 494 So. 2d 705 - Parrish v. State (1985)

102 state decisions

220190819101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. State · Horn v. State · Talbert v. State · Jackson v. State · Toulet v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Intent, we know, being a state or condition of the mind, is rarely, if ever, susceptible of direct or positive proof, and must usually be inferred from the facts testified to by witnesses and the circumstances as developed by the evidence.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The principle invoked by the defendant is that force is an essential element of rape, and that, on a charge of assault with intent to commit rape, the evidence, to be sufficient to justify the conviction, should show such acts and conduct on the part of the accused as would leave no reasonable doubt of his intention to gratify his lustful desire against the consent of the female and notwithstanding resistance on her part. This principle is well supported by our own decisions, and we accept it as the law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.