Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 Ariz. 384 - State v. Britain

State v. Britain’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · State v. Emery · State v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “view[ing] a request for consent to search, after the [Fifth Amendment] right to counsel has been invoked, as interrogation and the serving of a search warrant as conduct `reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.