State v. Charo’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably State v. Murray (1995), State v. Fulminante (1989)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shepard v. United States · State v. Jeffers · 53 Cal. 2d 160 - People v. Atchley · State v. Robinson · United States v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the idea of proving that a victim was afraid of the defendant as admissible to prove identity has been thoroughly rejected. People v. Armendariz, 37 Cal.3d 573, 581 , 209 Cal.Rptr. 664, 672 , 693 P.2d 243, 251 (1984) (“A victim’s out-of-court statements of fear of an accused are admissible ... only when the victim’s conduct in conformity with that fear is in dispute. Absent such dispute, the statements are irrelevant.”). The Arizona Rules of Evidence are consonant with the above view on the state of mind exception and, therefore, require that the rule in Gause be rejected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fulminante“[a] statement of the declarant’s then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health) offered to prove his present condition or future action, but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Linton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.