Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 CALAPP2D 784 - People v. Bowman

People v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
3
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2006 · most notably 41 Cal. 3d 1 - People v. Croy (1985), 58 Cal. 2d 732 - People v. Marsh (1962)

48 state decisions

260195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Wells · People v. Roberts · People v. Nunn · People v. . Flack · People v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the accused must have had a specific intent to do an unlawful act or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. This, in one case, may involve proving that he had the intent to commit murder; in another, that he had the intent to steal; in another, that he had the intent to violate a statute. If, in a charge of conspiracy, the act involves a violation of positive law, the People must show the accused intended to violate it, or entered into the common purpose with knowledge that a violation of law would result from the commission of the contemplated act.proof of the mere commission of the act is not enough--there must be proof of a specific intent to violate the law. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The criminal quality [of a conspiracy] resides in the intention of the parties to the agreement, construed in connection with the purpose contemplated. The mere fact that the conspiracy has for its object the doing of an act which may be unlawful, followed by the doing of such act, does not constitute the crime of conspiracy, unless the jury find that the parties were actuated by a criminal intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Phrase ‘good faith’ in common usage has a well-defined and generally understood meaning, being ordinarily used to describe that state of mind denoting honesty of purpose, freedom from intention to defraud, and generally speaking, means being faithful to one’s duty or obligation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.