156 Cal. App. 4th 1508 - Garretson v. Post’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 29 Cal. 4th 53 - Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. · 29 Cal. 4th 82 - Navellier v. Sletten · 19 Cal. 4th 1106 - Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity · 39 Cal. 4th 299 - Flatley v. Mauro · 10 Cal. 4th 1226 - Alliance Mortgage Co. v. Rothwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““All of the following shall constitute privileged communications pursuant to Section 47: “(1) The mailing, publication, and delivery of notices as required by this section. “(2) Performance of the procedures set forth in this article. “(3) Performance of the functions and procedures set forth in this article' if those functions and procedures are necessary to carry out the duties described in Sections 729.040, 729.050, and 729.080 of the Code of Civil Procedure.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not involve legislative, executive, or judicial proceedings. Nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings are statutorily based.... [A]ccording to the proponents of the 1996 amendment to the nonjudicial foreclosure statute, ... 'a nonjudicial foreclosure is a private, contractual proceeding, rather than an official, governmental proceeding or action.' [Citations.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Although the interpretation of language in Civil Code section 47 has been used to interpret similar language in the anti-SLAPP statute [citation], we reject the broad conclusion that conduct deemed communicative for purposes of Civil Code section 47 automatically qualifies as constitutionally protected speech under section 425.16”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.