Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 Conn. 268 - Console v. Nickou

Console v. Nickou’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
9
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 87 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Santopietro v. City of New Haven (1996), Solomon v. Aberman (1985)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 87 state decisions

2801968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pierce v. Albanese · Ardoline v. Keegan · Arkansas Public Service Commission v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission · Hennessey v. Hennessey · United States v. Vorreiter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The test of the sufficiency of proof by circumstantial evidence is whether rational minds could reasonably and logically draw the inference. Andrea v. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co., 144 Conn. 340, 344 , 131 A.2d 642 ; Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 256 , 129 A.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15 , 78 S.Ct. 36 , 2 L.Ed.2d 21 . The proof need not be so conclusive that it precludes every other hypothesis. It is sufficient if the proof produces in the mind of the trier a reasonable belief that it is more probable than otherwise that the fact to be inferred is true...."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.