Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

156 F. 1023

Docket No. 1,475.

Mexican Cent. Ry. Co. v. Eckman

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1907.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1907-11-26

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1977

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Slater v. Mexican National Railroad · Gould v. Youngworth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1907-11-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas.

¶2T. A. Falvey and Waters Davis, for plaintiff in error.

¶3Geo. E. Wallace, for defendant in error.

¶4Before PARDEE, MeCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Considering the answer of the Supreme Court of the United States to the questions heretofore certified in this case (see Mexican Central Railway Co., Ltd., v. J. W. Eckman, Guardian, etc., 205 U. S. 538, 27 Sup. Ct. 791, 51 L. Ed. 920, and the case of Slater v. Mexican Central National Railroad Company, 194 U. S. 120. 24 Sup. Ct 581, 48 L. Ed. 900), the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and this cause is remanded, with instructions to dismiss the same at the costs of the plaintiff below, but without prejudice to an action in any court willing and competent to administer relief under the laws of Mexico.

/156/f1d/1023 · .json · Public domain