Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 F.1d 103 - In re Sunseri

In re Sunseri’s Empirical Analysis

156 F. 103 · 1907

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 1913
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Louisville Trust Company v. Leonard Comingor · In re Teschmacher & Mrazay · In re Davis Tailoring Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Tliat it was beyond the jurisdiction oí this court to seize any goods outside its territorial limits (the said town of Huntingdon lining in the middle district of Pennsylvania); and that for the reasons above stated, as to their claiming this property adversely and with more than colorable title, this court is without jurisdiction to determine the title to it in this summary manner.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.