In re Kenyon’s Empirical Analysis
156 F. 863 · 1907
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1957
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Johnston · Wiswall v. Campbell · Moller v. . Tuska · Kennedy v. . Thorp · In re Rider
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That a vendor could not affirm the contract of sale as to part of the goods, and claim the price and disaffirm as to another part, and recover the goods in specie.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Kaplan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.