Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

156 F.2d 158

Docket No. 10223.

Butler v. Kavanagh

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1946.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1946-06-10

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1946

2 counsel of record

Relies on Butler v. Kavanagh

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1946-06-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Roman F. Glocheski and Laurent K. Varnum, both of Grand Rapids, Mich., and Robert S. Marx, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2John C. Lehr, of Detroit, Mich., and Sewall Key, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

¶3Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause having been duly considered upon the transcript of record and the oral *159arguments and briefs of attorneys, and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the findings of fact and that the opinion of the district court reasoned to a correct conclusion, the judgment of the district court, 64 F.Supp. 741, dismissing the complaint is affirmed.

/156/f2d/158 · .json · Public domain