Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
156 F.2d 483 · 1946
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 1999 · most notably Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering & Machine, Inc. (1978), Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. USM Corp. (1975)
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Swift & Co. · Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Mercoid Corporation v. Mid-Continent Inv Co · Heiser v. Woodruff · Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]n a decree, at least in one entered by consent, either an adjudication of infringement, or a grant of some relief from which infringement may be inferred, is essential before any effect of res judicata can be given to it on the issue of validity.” 10”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the public interest in a judicial determination of the invalidity of a worthless patent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“should not remain in the art as a scarecrow.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.