Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 F.2d 632 - Reilly v. Pescor

Reilly v. Pescor’s Empirical Analysis

156 F.2d 632 · 1946

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2014

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

6019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1565 · 10 U.S.C. § 1566

Relies on Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Walker v. Johnston · Quirin Haupt Kerling Burger Heinck Thiel Neubauer United States Quirin v. Cox Usa 6 · Carter v. McClaughry · Grafton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘A record of trial showed affirmatively that no investigation of the charges had been made prior to the trial. Held that the provisions of Article of War 70, 41 Stat. 759 [ 10 U.S.C.A. § 1542 ], with reference to investigating charges are mandatory and there must be a substantial compliance therewith before charges can legally be referred to trial. A court-martial is without jurisdiction to try an accused upon charges referred to it for trial without having been first investigated in substantial compliance with the provisions of Article of War 70, and in such a case the court martial proceedings are void ab initio.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.