Fleming v. Tate’s Empirical Analysis
156 F.2d 848 · 1946
Citation profile
62 federal appellate · 10 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently September 2000 · most notably Hyser v. Reed (1963), Rose v. Haskins (1968)
62 federal appellate · 10 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Anderson v. Corall · Story v. Rives
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Sec. 6. When a prisoner has been retaken upon a warrant issued by the Board of Parole, he shall be given an opportunity to appear before the Board, a member thereof, or an examiner designated by the Board. At such hearing he may be represented by counsel. * * * ””
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Reid · Hock v. Hagan““A prisoner retaken upon a warrant issued by the Board of Parole, shall be given an opportunity to appear before the Board, a member thereof, or an examiner designated by the Board. “The Board may then, or at any time in its discretion, revoke the order of parole and terminate such parole or modify the terms and conditions thereof.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Parole agents are human, and it is possible that friction between the agent and parolee may have influenced the agent's judgment. In fairness to the violator this is a possibility which should be investigated by some higher authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rose v. Haskins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.