Garrovillas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
156 F.3d 1010 · 1998
Citation profile
84 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 324 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Farah v. Ashcroft (2003), Shobna Chandar Lata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2000)
84 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Ghaly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sangha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Berroteran-Melendez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 324 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`individualized analysis' of how changed conditions will affect the specific petitioner's situation.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]nconsistencies of less than substantial importance for which a plausible explanation is offered”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he BIA must have `a legitimate articulable basis to question the petitioner's credibility, and must offer a specific, cogent reason for any stated disbelief.' " Garrovillas, 156 F.3d at 1013 (quoting Osorio, 99 F.3d at 931). Indeed,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.