McGreevy v. Daktronics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
156 F.3d 837 · 1998
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tibke v. McDougall · Hauser v. Equifax, Inc. · Landstrom v. Shaver · Sip-Top, Inc. v. Ekco Group, Inc. · Dahl v. Sittner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'without weighing the credibility of the witnesses, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the verdict.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. the existence of a valid business relationship or expectancy; 2. knowledge by the interferer of the relationship or expectancy; 3. an intentional and unjustified act of interference on the part of the interferer; 4. proof that the interference caused the harm sustained; and, 5. damage to the party whose relationship or expectancy was disrupted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hohn v. Spurgeon“A mere scintilla of evidence is inadequate to support a verdict, and judgment as a matter of law is proper when the record contains no proof beyond speculation to support the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chris Boudreau
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.