Chaney v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
156 F.3d 921 · 1998
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2016
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Teague v. Lane · Lockett v. Ohio · Sandin v. Conner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“negative implication from mandatory language in prisoner regulations ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Lambright v. Stewart“negative implication from mandatory language in prisoner regulations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Lambright v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.