Richart v. Roper’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Butterine Co. v. Hargrave
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It may be true that the husband was the general manager of the property and looked after the rents and upkeep, but in a long line of decisions beginning with Ohio Butterine Co. et al. v. Hargrave, 79 Fla. 458 , 84 So. 376 , and concluding with Berlin v. Jacobs et al., [ 156 Fla. 773 ] 24 So.2d 717 , this court has held that on ac count of the unity of interest of husband and wife in an estate by the entireties neither could sell, lease or contract for the disposition of it without the joint consent and agreement of the other to do so.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“on account of the unity of interest of husband and wife in an estate by the entireties neither could sell, lease or contract for the disposition of it without the joint consent and agreement of the other to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sheehan v. Hubbard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.