Katzman v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)
Relies on Oglesby v. United States Department of the Army · Ss Silberblatt Inc Ss v. East Harlem Pilot Block Building Housing Development Fund Company Inc · Block · State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp. · Platsky v. Central Intelligence Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is technically categorized under Rule 15(d) . . . as opposed to Rule 15(a). The latter subsection is designed chiefly to allow a party to replead or to add facts or claims that arise either prior to or contemporaneous with the allegations stated in the original complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Upon motion of a party the court may . . . permit the party to serve a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions or occurrences or events which have happened since the date of the pleading sought to be supplemented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“plaintiff's proposed additions to his complaint principally recite transactions, occurrences or events that have transpired since the date of the pleading sought to be supplemented,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.