Mitchell v. Jaffe’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 215
Relies on United States v. Darby · Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co. · Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co. · 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. Callus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * the court is content to conclude that on the precise facts of this case, defendant’s employees were not shown to have been engaged in performing any activities which were closely related or directly essential to the production of goods under Section 3(j) of the Act as amended in 1949. * Mitchell v. Jaffe, D.C.N.D.Ala.1957, 156 F.Supp. 596 , 599.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mitchell v. Jaffe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.