Meyer v. Dygert’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Cady v. Bush · Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co. · L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp. · Larson v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n an action against a [licensed attorney] alleging negligence or malpractice in rendering a professional service where expert testimony is to be used by a party to establish a prima facie case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sandhu v. Kanzler“the intent, knowledge or motive of the converter is immaterial except as affecting damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an obviously missed deadline or a clear case of stealing client funds”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sandhu v. Kanzler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.