Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 FSUPP2D 1081 - Meyer v. Dygert

Meyer v. Dygert’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Cady v. Bush · Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co. · L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp. · Larson v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n an action against a [licensed attorney] alleging negligence or malpractice in rendering a professional service where expert testimony is to be used by a party to establish a prima facie case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the intent, knowledge or motive of the converter is immaterial except as affecting damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an obviously missed deadline or a clear case of stealing client funds”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.