Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 FSUPP2D 697 - Traharne v. Wayne/Scott Fetzer Co.

Traharne v. Wayne/Scott Fetzer Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2021

1 state decisions

30200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Brown v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · Jacobs v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections · Ferebee v. Chevron Chemical Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Dauberb gatekeeping function of trial courts was not meant to force product liability plaintiffs to obtain as experts inventors or designers of new and improved products in order to succeed in products liability litigation. Product design is achieved over many years of research and testing by corporate Research and Development Departments and only after the expenditure of huge sums of money and manpower. Such testing expenditures would be cost prohibitive for the vast majority of plaintiffs. To require physical testing of an expert’s opinion before the expert is permitted to testify would mean the elimination of product liability suits by ordinary non-corporate citizens. No ordinary citizen could afford such prohibitive up front litigation costs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.