156 Ga. App. 74 - Spry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2019
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roth v. United States · Miller v. California · Sewell v. State · Dyke v. State · 93 Ga. App. 48 - Felton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“simply gave the jury a better understanding of the meaning of prurient appeal. See Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 477(4), 487 [77 S.Ct. 1304, 1310, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498] ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“material which has a tendency to excite lustful thoughts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.