Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 ILL 331 - Matzenbaugh v. Doyle

Matzenbaugh v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
6
states following
July 1952
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 1952

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

601895190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMatzenbaugh v. Doyle

Relationships

Relies on Emory v. Keighan · Brown v. Parker · Emory v. Keighan · Gardner v. Bunn · Stein v. Good

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not reasonable to suppose that the party executing a warrant of attorney with a note intends to confer any authority by it beyond the life of the note.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.