Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““One of the primary goals of the system of justice is a speedy determination of the litigants’ rights. We think the Supreme Court intended that a trial court should be given an opportunity to correct its errors, if any. However, once the court has been given that opportunity, the party aggrieved by the court’s ruling should have the immediate right to appeal the court’s ruling. We believe the intent of the Supreme Court as expressed in Rule AP. 4(A) is just what the rule plainly says, and that the logical extension of that construction is that a subsequent motion to correct errors is not required to appeal from the granting of the opposing party’s motion to correct errors.” (Emphasis supplied.) Davis v. Davis, supra at 839 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 159 Ind. App. 290 - Davis v. Davis

2. ““A ruling or order by the trial court granting or denying a motion to correct errors shall be deemed a final judgment, and an appeal may be taken therefrom.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 159 Ind. App. 290 - Davis v. Davis