Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 Ind. App. 489 - Neeley v. State

156 Ind. App. 489 - Neeley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1994

7 state decisions

40197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bernard v. State · State v. Bridenhager · 154 Ind. App. 147 - Shank v. State · Lander v. State · Workman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The most recent session of the Indiana General Assembly has, however, passed proposed criminal procedure provisions which have neither attempted nor suggested incorporation of Rule TR. 52a. See I.C. 1971, 35-4.1-2-2, as added by Acts 1973, PL. 325, § 4. Pursuant to I.C. 1971, 34-5-2-1, Ind. Stat. Anno. 2-4718, these rules will not become effective in the trial courts of Indiana until approved by the Supreme Court of Indiana.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Neeley v. State
  2. ““Any touching of the person of another against his will with physical force, in an intentional, hostile and aggressive manner, or a projecting of such force against his person . . . . Any impairment of physical condition of another’s body or physical pain or illness, but does not include minute disturbance of nerve centers caused by fear, shock or other emotion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Wise v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.