Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 KAN 60 - Ahring v. White

Ahring v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2005 · most notably Thompson v. General Finance Co., Inc. (1970), Tappen v. Ager (1979)

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions

1001942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Malone v. Murphy · Marbourg v. Smith · McClenny v. Inverarity · Walker v. Smay · Carbondale Investment Co. v. Burdick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An action for malicious prosecution of a civil suit differs from an action for damages for abuse of process. (McClenny v. Inverarity, 80 Kan. 569 , 103 Pac. 82 .) In abuse of process it is said the gist of the tort is not commencing an action or causing process to issue without justification, but misusing or misapplying process, justified in itself, for an end other than that which it was designed to accomplish. (Prosser on Torts, 892).” (p. 63.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.