Johnson v. Best’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 1994 · most notably In Re Guardianship of Williams (1994), Walker v. McNutt (1948)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dixon v. Fluker · Jones v. Jones · In re Brown · Jaggar v. Rader · In re Melroy v. Keiser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The order of a probate court appointing a guardian for the person of a minor, without notice to or consent of the child's mother, and where no issue concerning the mother's fitness is presented or determined in such appointment proceedings, is not binding on the mother and does not impair her right to the custody of her child."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re McCoy · Loveland v. Reed“"... The petition for the appointment of appellant did not confer jurisdiction on the probate court to appoint a guardian over the person of the child which would be binding on the mother, the natural and statutory guardian of her child ..."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re McCoy · Loveland v. Reed““Had the appointment of appellant as guardian been valid, appellee would not have been deprived of the custody of her child by virtue of such appointment where appellee’s fitness was not made an issue and determined against her in the proceedings for the appointment of appellant as guardian. (In re Brown, 98 Kan. 663 , 159 Pac. 504 ; Melroy v. Keiser, 123 Kan. 513 , 255 Pac. 978 ; Jagger v. Rader, 134 Kan. 570 , 7 P. 2d 114 .)” (p. 671.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.