Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 Md. 149 - Neusbaum v. State

Neusbaum v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

142
cited by 142 later decisions
3
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

5 district · 137 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably State v. Fabritz (1975), Chisley v. State (1953)

5 district · 137 state decisions

30019281930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nelson v. Seiler · Lanasa v. State · Commonwealth v. Jordan · Rowan v. State · State v. Noakes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At common law it was essential that the indictment should show the name of the person charged, the name of the person killed, the jurisdiction within which and the time at which the homicide occurred, that it was felonious and such of the facts and circumstances incident to the crime as were reasonably necessary to identify it, and to enable the court to see whether a crime had been committed as charged. Wharton Cr. Proc., ch. 16.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “first statement was an involuntary exclamation of horror, induced by the shock of seeing a human being run over and possibly fatally injured by an automobile, her second statement was the result of a voluntary investigation made by her for the purpose of ascertaining the identity of the person owning or driving the automobile which caused the injury, and her announcement of the result of her investigation was pure hearsay. [Id. at 164.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “against the peace, government and dignity of the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.