156 Md. App. 657 - Biglari v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2020
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Illinois v. Allen · 5 Md. App. 450 - Williams v. State · Parren v. State · State v. Sweezy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The court shall appoint a qualified interpreter to help a defendant ... when the defendant ... (2) Cannot readily understand or communicate the English language and cannot understand a charge ... or help present the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kusi v. State“there is no question that the trial judge has broad discretion to control the conduct in his or her courtroom. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Elrich S.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.