Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

156 Misc. 792

Dorsey v. Cohen

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1935

New York Supreme Court · decided 1935-08-29

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1935-08-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1952

3 state decisions

10193519401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Rosenman, J.

¶1The provisions of section 135 of the Election Law, added by chapter 955 of the Laws of 1935, requiring a statement showing when and where the subscribing witness was last registered, is a substantial amendment. Its efficacy to prevent fraud is not a matter for the court’s consideration. It must be complied with, along with other formal requirements of law. Non-compliance therewith justifies the action which the board of elections has taken. Motion denied. Settle order on one day’s notice.

/156/misc/792 · .json · Public domain