Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 MO 286 - Axman v. Smith

Axman v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2014

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

60190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tripp v. Cook · Dunn v. McCoy · Tatum v. Holliday · Denning v. Smith · Lipscomb v. New York Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trustee is not the mere agent or attorney for the holder of the note, but he is the trusted agent of both *Page 532 debtor and creditor. [Jones on Mort. (5 Ed.) sec. 1771.] In the sale of property under a deed like the one in question, he should use all reasonable effort and methods to make it bring as much as possible, and he should be fair and impartial as between debtor and creditor”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.