156 N.C. App. 335 - State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · State v. Braswell · State v. Evans · State v. Tunstall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fraudulent intent required for embezzlement is defined as the intent to willfully and corruptly use or misapply another's property for purposes other than that for which it was held.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Richardson“provided defendant sufficient notice of the charges against her to protect defendant from double jeopardy, to enable her to prepare her defense, and to inform the court of the charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Western“[Defendant] ... did ... go away with and convert to her own use U.S. currency ... which had been delivered to be kept for her employer's use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Western
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.