Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 N.J. Super. 347 - State v. McDaniel

156 N.J. Super. 347 - State v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
9
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 8 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably State v. Bruzzese (1983), Sammons v. Taylor (1992)

6 federal appellate · 8 district · 28 state decisions

250197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Jones v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Ventresca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he common theme underlying these cases and others is that something more must be shown to justify impoundment of a car than that it would otherwise be left unattended. There must be a showing that some reasonable necessity prompted the impoundment. This is a salutary rule, for otherwise police would be authorized to freely stop a car for a minor traffic infraction, impound it and search it with impunity. Surely such a circumstance is not consonant with the Fourth Amendment. As the court in United States v. Edwards, 554 F.2d 1331, 1339 (5th Cir.1977), said: “The fourth amendment is not crushed by the four wheels of an automobile; automobiles do not work a forfeiture of privacy.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.