156 N.J. Super. 35 - State v. Chatman’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably State v. Fuller (2000), 242 N.J. Super. 601 - State v. Frost (1990)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Patterson v. United States · Roberts v. Louisiana · Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. · State v. MacOn · Beal v. Franklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] witness may be qualified to testify as an expert either `by study without practice or by practice without study.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he modern tendency to permit expert testimony wherever it would help the jury decide the ultimate issue of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.