156 N.J. Super. 42 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1990
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 117 N.J. Super. 425 - Van Realty, Inc. v. City of Passaic · 148 N.J. Super. 250 - Ulinsky v. Avignone · 133 N.J. Super. 508 - State v. San Vito · 142 N.J. Super. 283 - State v. Petti · 139 N.J. Super. 166 - State v. EBR
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the usefulness of the information of the arrest and the proceedings to law enforcement authorities and to anyone who might obtain such information outweighs the desirability of having a person, who has been acquitted or against whom charges have been dismissed or discharged, freed from any disabilities attached to the arrest which preceded that acquittal, dismissal or discharge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Biggs v. Jascalevich“This called for a weighing of the considerations specified therein, followed by the making of appropriate findings of fact and “expression of the reasoning which, applied to the found facts, led to the conclusion below.” Van Realty, Inc. v. Passaic, 117 N. J. Super. 425, 428 (App. Div. 1971). [156 N. J. Super, at 46]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Biggs v. Jascalevich“It was, accordingly, incumbent upon the trial court to determine first whether there were any “grounds for denial””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Heggen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.