Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 Ohio App. 3d 128 - State v. Lamb

156 Ohio App. 3d 128 - State v. Lamb’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Nero · State v. Engle · State v. Stewart · Woods v. Telb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial compliance means that under the totality of the circumstances the defendant subjectively understands the implications of his plea and the rights he is waiving.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * that in order to substantially comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a), a trial court must advise a defendant of any mandatory post-release control period at the time of the defendant's plea.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[a]fter prison release, I may have up to 3 years of post-release control.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.