Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

156 So. 2d 663

Roth v. Roth

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 9, 1963

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1963-10-09

Decided 1963-10-09

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant, in the conclusion of her brief, states:

“In view of the misconception of law by the lower Court, this cause should, be remanded with instructions to find the defendant in contempt, to take testimony as to attorney’s fees, to award petitioner’s attorney a reasonable fee and to modify the Property Settlement Agreement.”

¶2We find no error in the order of the trial judge refusing to find appellee in contempt so we affirm and also deny any attorneys’ fees in this case.

¶3Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.
/156/so2d/663 · .json · Public domain