Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 So. 2d 833 - Tyson v. Lanier

156 So. 2d 833 - Tyson v. Lanier’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2004 · most notably 456 So. 2d 1175 - Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Young (1984), 898 So. 2d 1 - Knowles v. Beverly Enterprises-Florida (2004)

40 state decisions

20019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 111 So. 2d 439 - Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIR. AUTH. · 128 So. 2d 594 - Zirin v. Charles Pfizer & Co. · State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon Park · Hayes v. Walker · State v. City of Miami

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * that `just valuation' as provided in the Constitution was synonymous with `full cash value' as provided in the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"All lands being used for agricultural purposes shall be assessed as agricultural lands upon an acreage basis, regardless of the fact that any or all of said lands are embraced in a plat of a subdivision or other real estate development. Provided, agricultural purposes shall include only lands being used in bona fide farming, pasture, grove or forestry operations by the lessee or owner, or some person in their employ. Lands which have not been used for agricultural purposes prior to the effective date of this law shall be prima facie subject to assessment on the same basis as assessed for the previous year, and any demand for a reassessment of such lands for agricultural purposes shall be subject to the severest scrutiny of the county tax assessor to the end that the lands shall be classified properly. Provided, this subsection shall not be construed, interpreted, or applied so as to permit lands being used for agricultural purposes to be assessed other than as agricultural lands and upon an acreage basis."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he organic requirements for `a uniform and equal rate of taxation' and `a just valuation of all' property, do not forbid but contemplate proper classification of property in making just valuations for taxation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.