156 So. 3d 176 - State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 951 So. 2d 124 - State v. Dick · 741 So. 2d 849 - State v. Gedric · 451 So. 2d 1074 - State v. Brown · Bancroft v. Louisiana Dept. of Corr. · 690 So. 2d 1118 - Potter v. Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The jurisdiction of the trial court is divested and that of the appellate court attaches upon the entering of the order of appeal. Thereafter, the trial court has no jurisdiction to take any action except as otherwise provided by law and to: .... (2) Correct an error or deficiency in the record. (3) Correct an illegal sentence or take other appropriate action pursuant to a properly made or filed motion to reconsider sentence. .... (7) Impose the penalty provided by Article 844. (8) Sentence the defendant pursuant to a conviction under the Habitual Offender Law as set forth in R.S. 15:529.1.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When the original sentence imposed is legal, none of the actions specified in Article 916 confer jurisdiction or authority upon a district court to impose a new sentence after an appeal is taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.