Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

156 So. 3d 583

Lundy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 30, 2015

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-01-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2019

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-01-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Amiri Lundy appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In that motion, Lundy alleged separate claims numbered one through nine. Our review of the Order reveals that as to claims numbered one through four and claim number eight, the records attached do not refute Lundy’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We, therefore, reverse that part of the Order under review summarily denying claims one, two, three, four, and eight and remand for an evidentiary hearing. In all other respects, the Order is affirmed.

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.
/156/so3d/583 · .json · Public domain