156 So. 3d 770 - State v. Bowens’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · 488 So. 2d 965 - State v. Rosiere
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing a claim that a sentence is excessive, an appellate court generally must determine whether the trial judge has adequately complied with statutory guidelines in La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1 and whether the sentence is warranted under the facts established by the record. If adequate compliance with Article 894.1 is found, the reviewing court must determine whether the sentence the district court imposed is too severe in light of the particular defendant as well as the particular circumstances of the case, "keeping in mind that maximum sentences should be reserved for the most egregious violators of the offense so charged." State v. Landry , 2003-1671, p.8 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), 871 So.2d 1235 , 1239 ; see also State v. Bonicard , 98-0665, p.3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 8/4/99), 752 So.2d 184 , 185.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the defendant shot at the victim seventeen times and struck him eight times”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.