Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 SO3D 956 - Irions v. Holt

Irions v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 455 So. 2d 863 - Ex Parte McLendon · 602 So. 2d 344 - IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc. · 646 So. 2d 46 - Ex Parte Perkins · 655 So. 2d 1060 - Scholl v. Parsons · Ex Parte Foley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' " ' "Our standard of review is very limited in cases where the evidence is presented ore tenus. A custody determination of the trial court entered upon oral testimony is accorded a presumption of correctness on appeal, ... and we will not reverse unless the evidence so fails to support the determination that it is plainly and palpably wrong, or unless an abuse of the trial court's discretion is shown. To substitute our judgment for that of the trial court would be to reweigh the evidence. This Alabama law does not allow....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.